虽说人人生来权利平等，但总有些地方不同才让这世界多姿多彩……这是我个人制作的对妹子的评分标准，与网上、其他人常说的不太一样，不是以分数（10/10之类）而是以级别（A+, A, A-. B+等）形成。每个字母间为一个大等级，由性质定义区分。+，与减号-
我认为更加合理，所以我身边朋友大多也有使用我这个标准。同样的标准可能也可以用来评男的，但是我作为个直男真对汉子没有任何兴趣……
其实这个表本来应有两个评判：外观和总体。之所以大多数时候只需要一个等级标准原因有二：大多数女生外观级别与总体分不会差超过两个小级（A-到B，B+到B-），其次大多数时候评级只适用于外观，等你了解那个人后因familiarity principle你自然会觉得那人长得可爱多了，所以常常长相与性格不能完全分离，也是为什么这两个分值一般很接近。但在偶尔遇上性格不良的美女（卖相妖女，红颜祸水？）或性格品质非常棒而长相中等偏上的女性时才会用到单论长相。这也是为何此分数常与愿意性交的程度关联（一夜情不需要了解性格）。
外观：说白了就是长相。平时非常短期遇上一个妹子你只需要一个非常简单的评高低，那么这个级别分割可以以性质区分：
+/-：后缀于每个等级后，相当于在同一性质下优先级更高/低的目标。这个大多时候不需要用到，只用在比较两个（比如都是A）同等的人时，以此分辨而避免渣男现象。
A：最高等级，一般只代表人群2.5%的顶层。从性质上属于你愿意投入精力追求，拥有后忠守一辈子的女性（一生推）。粗俗来讲便是愿意只干她，干一辈子的。一般在一个环境下这个高等级的妹子能有一个就很不错了。A+例子：Audrey Hepburn, Emma Watson, 霍思燕
B：稍微多一些，这类女性你看到感觉非常好，做女朋友一定也会让你一心一意。但是若要投入所有精力去追求会觉得有更好的目标这么做，所以最理想是这妹子对你也有意思的情况。粗俗来讲就是你不会像对A级那样恶狗扑食，但是得到后一样干一辈子也值得（长期伴侣）。B+一般来说非常接近A级，
C：这类妹子相对常见。平时看起来挺顺眼，做朋友打打闹闹很高兴，拍合照也可以炫耀。但是做女朋友相比可能会有更好的选择。粗俗来讲就是一夜情女神（短期伴侣资源投入较低），做女朋友你可能会有一定动力与其他≥C级的女性出轨。C-基本上属于女朋友的最低标准。
D：大众分配区域，~50%女性，长相中间值。这些妹子不难看，也不出彩，因为是女性而自然发散有限的吸引力。很好的一夜情目标，但是做女朋友常能找到更合适的选择，所以除非你已然饥不择食否则大多数时候不会妥协在这个等级。D-真的是做女朋友最低标准……有可能的情况下有较高动力换个≥D级的女朋友。
E：做朋友不会反感，饥不择食时的短期性伴侣，但不会选择做长期伴侣。长相一般中等或中等偏下，吸引度须靠品德智慧等补全。
F：这个……就不提了吧。F字标一般就代表不及格（Fail），从F级开始就没必要分+/-了。
G：真·恐龙。白天辟邪，晚上避孕。
总体分主要只是增加考虑人格：性格，幽默感，智慧，教育程度，善良等等。因为一般人都还是好人，所以加入人格考虑后一般不会有妹子掉级（除非如之前说的妖女……）。
换算：如果要用10分点: A+ = 10 A ≈ 9.5 A- ≈ 9, B+ ≈ 8.5 B ≈ 8 B- ≈ 7.5, C+ ≈ 7 C ≈ 7.5-6 C- ≈ 5.5, D+/D ≈ 5 D- ≈ 4.5 再往下基本也不会有兴趣评分了就不必换算了……
Peanut's Scale of Female Attraction Rating (PSFAR)
Used for scaling the attractiveness and potential (long term and short term) mate preferences. Predominantly designed to measure female, but could be adapted to measure male targets. This scale uses categorical definitions to distinguish major divisions, then fine-tuned with +/- signs to indicate within-division preference.
A: Absolutely stunning, 10/10 would bang, and will only bang, for the rest of your life. You will be highly motivated to invest all resource and energy to engage with her, and let her become your girlfriends. No justification for seeking other females once girlfriend status is achieved. Rarely would you find a girl of this division. Examples: Audrey Hepburn, Emma Watson
B: Relatively more common, the "1st choice girl" you encounter most of the time. Very high quality, captivating females. You will love to accept them as girlfriend and treat them like in A division. However there are alternatives that you will rather invest all energy in pursuing (A division girls), so B division has a slightly lower priority.
C: Great short term mate, but lower priority as long term mate. Though you will not necessarily invest energy, you will find it pleasant to have them as girlfriend if they show interest in you.
D: The vast normal girls. They are likely nice to have as short term mate, but you will easily notice better alternatives for long term. Their attractiveness alone cannot provide enough arousal but still desirable friends given their personality.
E: Average girls, no noticable advantage for attractiveness. Ok as friends, alright for one-night-stands as well if you are really in need, but no consideration of engagement.
F: F stands for fail. These are girls below average. They are fine for friends, you won't necessarily feel repulsive to their presence. Starting from this division, there is no need for +/- sign to fine tune the minor divisions.
G: Actually ugly girls. You feel their presence start to be objectional in varying degrees. You won't even feel really arouse if they try to seduce you.
Approximate exchange to 10/10 scale: A+ = 10 A ≈ 9.5 A- ≈ 9, B+ ≈ 8.5 B ≈ 8 B- ≈ 7.5, C+ ≈ 7 C ≈ 7.5-6 C- ≈ 5.5, D+/D ≈ 5 D- ≈ 4.5. And I believe usually you won't even bother with assigning numbers after this division...
